Still basking in universal praise for his assertive role in finally brokering a ceasefire in Gaza, Trump reverted to his usual self and shocked the world by announcing a plan to ethnically cleanse Gaza.
On January 25, aboard Air Force One, during a 20-minute question-and-answer session with reporters while traveling from Las Vegas to Miami, Trump, unhinged, announced to a flabbergasted press that he is working on a plan to forcefully remove Palestinians from Gaza to neighboring Arab countries.
“I’d like Egypt to take people. You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing and say, ‘You know, it’s over.’” “I’d love for you to take on more, because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now, and it’s a mess. It’s a real mess.” (This was in reference to a conversation he had with King Abdullah II of Jordan.)
Trump repeated this call on January 28 and January 30 to confirm his seriousness about the proposal, in case anyone still had doubts. When asked to respond to the fierce rejection of his proposal by Arab leaders, particularly Egypt and Jordan—who both unequivocally denied any cooperation with such a plan—Trump responded, “We do a lot for them, and they’re going to do it.” Here, Trump is referring to the military aid the US annually gives to Egypt and Jordan, which he potentially sees as leverage for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
The Jewish state, with the help of transnational Jewish figures like Antony Blinken and Jake Sullivan, is accused of destroying Gaza and committing genocide, now allegedly using American financial power as leverage to displace Palestinians. In Joe Biden’s administration, these two figures were seen as dictating Middle East policy, with Biden merely providing rubber stamp approval.
:
So, who are the Jewish Jihadists behind Trump’s latest shocking proposals, and why now?
The ethnic cleansing of Gaza plan is not new; it has been the goal of the Jewish Jihadists since the British Mandate. This Mandate was not truly about creating two states for two peoples, as some modern historians might claim, but rather about erasing Arabs and “reconstituting” Jews in the land. The term “reconstitute” was emphasized in the British Mandate documents, referring to Biblical Israel where Jews were believed to have once lived and ruled. This indicates that even before the Holocaust and the establishment of Israel, Jewish activists were contemplating the elimination of Palestinians from their land, with assistance from the British Empire. However, this is a long and complex story that would require a book to fully document, so we’ll skip this contentious history for now and focus on Trump’s first term and Jared Kushner’s ‘Plan’:
Trump’s pitch to American voters during the 2016 presidential campaign was that he was the master of the “Art of the Deal,” and to prove this, he pledged to broker peace between Israel and Palestine—a task that had eluded ten previous presidents. He called this ambitious plan the “Deal of the Century.” While some scoffed at his ambitions, others actively worked to undermine them. Those who dismissed and mocked his peace plan were career bureaucrats and liberal elites who believe they alone understand the Israeli and Palestinian psyche. On the other hand, those who went to great lengths to thwart his plan were the Jewish Jihadists, who, with their historical and fanatical outlook, have developed an acute sense of any threat to their agenda.
Recognizing Trump’s stubbornness and his inclination to make everything about himself, Netanyahu and his allies in Washington took his promise seriously and devised various tactics to prevent its realization. These tactics included flattery, demonization of Palestinians, and Ivanka and Jared Kushner. Through conservative influencers and Q-Anon adherents, they played to Trump’s ego, comparing him to Cyrus, the Persian King from biblical lore who supposedly saved the Jewish people. The implication being that Trump was a great man chosen by God to serve and assist the Jewish State, and therefore, he must not make concessions to God’s enemies—the Palestinians. Trump, being the personality he is, blushed at this flattery and began parroting it. This is how the unfounded claim that he was the “best American president for the Jewish state” originated, despite previous U.S. presidents, including Truman, having done similar or better things for Israel. In reality, there was nothing Cyrus-like about Trump.
With Trump then now being overwhelmed by flattery and media adulations,
The Jewish Jihadi son-in-law.
Netanyahu and his allies swooped in and told Trump that since he is now Cyrus, the messy politics of the Middle East should be regarded as being beneath him. Therefore, they advised Trump to hand the Middle East process over to his son-in-law.
And since he is such a great man, he should focus only on achieving great things involving great people closer to his stature. They suggested he should focus on grandiose diplomatic initiatives like meetings with Putin, Xi of China, and Kim Jong Un of North Korea. They assured him that they would play their part, and any achievements by his not-so-experienced son-in-law, Jared Kushner, would be credited to him. Excited by the prospect, Trump gave Kushner his blessings to handle the Middle East. This is how Trump and Putin’s famous meeting in Helsinki came about.
However, with no prior experience in international affairs and lacking a background in tough negotiations beyond apartment leases, Kushner called David Friedman– Trump’s ambassador to Israel and a settler himself, and Netanyahu for help. Netanyahu instructed Kushner and his handpicked staffers from the U.S. State Department, whose assignments were not consulted with the Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson–their task was not to make a deal but to sabotage the prospects of peace.
To achieve this, Netanyahu dictated to Kushner to propose a framework so absurd and unacceptable to the Palestinians that they would reject it outright without discussion. When the Palestinians inevitably rejected the plan, Kushner was to take it back to Trump, presenting it as evidence that the Palestinians were the obstacle to peace. This strategy aligned precisely with the final draft of Kushner’s two-year effort known as the “deal of the century.”
Kushner presented the Palestinians with an economic plan rather than the political solution they had sought for more than half a century. He bluntly told them to abandon their statehood dreams and, instead, accept financial assistance from the USA and wealthy Gulf states. In other words, take the money and leave Israel alone. The Palestinians rejected the proposal promptly, which was entirely expected. Netanyahu and Kushner then approached Trump, informing him that the Palestinians had rejected the peace plan he had invested significant time and energy into. Furious, Trump asked for a solution, and Netanyahu and Kushner, after a private discussion, returned with a new proposal: normalization deals with Arab countries. Despite Trump’s initial skepticism, Netanyahu and Kushner claimed to have a plan to convince Arab nations to abandon the Palestinians.
The plan devised by Netanyahu and Kushner to secure normalization deals with Arab countries had two components. The first involved outright bribery, offering money to Arab nations. The second part consisted of a veiled threat: the potential annexation of the entire West Bank. While Arab countries were not fond of the latter, they were certainly enticed by the promise of financial benefits.
Sudan, for example, enthusiastically accepted the deal, which included billions of dollars in annual funding, forgiveness of national debt by the World Bank, and commitments to substantial investments in the country by the American private sector. Donald Trump even offered to pay victims of the Sept. 11 attacks $700 million of U.S. funds to drop their pursuit of claims against the African country so that Sudan could sign normalization with Israel. The compensation was part of the conditions for Sudan’s removal from the list of state sponsors of terrorism and its signing of a normalization agreement with Israel. Interestingly, Trump framed the situation in a way that suggested Sudan had independently come up with the payment for U.S. terrorist victims. He tweeted, “GREAT news! The new government of Sudan, which is making great progress, agreed to pay $335 MILLION to U.S. terror victims and families. Once deposited, I will lift Sudan from the State Sponsors of Terrorism list. At long last, JUSTICE for the American people and a BIG step for Sudan!”
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) received the F-35 fighter jets from the U.S. as a precondition for its normalization agreement with Israel, becoming the second country to get its hands on the F-35 warplanes after Israel itself. Morocco, another Arab nation, secured territorial recognition from Trump in exchange for signing a deal with Israel. Collectively, these agreements are now known as the Abraham Accords, touted by Trump and his supporters as a historic foreign policy achievement.
While Trump claimed to be the master of the “Art of the Deal” in theory, it was Netanyahu who emerged as the ultimate beneficiary in practice. The plan’s successful implementation was orchestrated with the assistance of Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
The Final Solution
In October 2023, Israel launched a very destructive and barbaric assault on Gaza, resulting in the murder of thousands of women and children daily and the destruction of half of Gaza. Israel justified this inhumane act of savagery with what happened on October 7 of the same month. Rather than putting brakes on Israel’s murderous rampage, transnational Jewish Jihadists running the Biden administration, namely Antony Blinken, devised an ethnic cleansing plan disguised as a more humane solution than extermination.
The plan involved using the financial and diplomatic might of the U.S. to pressure Egypt and Jordan into accepting Palestinians into their countries, thereby helping the Jewish State to ethnically cleanse Gaza. Blinken, the Secretary of State, and the National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan—both transnational Jewish Jihadists—sat down with a barely functional, sleepy Joe Biden and convinced him to rubber-stamp their genocidal plan. And Joe Biden essentially did just that. This heinous genocidal plan was, believe it or not, considered a more humane substitute for a far worse one by Jewish Jihadist extremists within the Netanyahu government.
Through an Israeli think tank, these Jewish Jihadists published a proposal many dubbed the new “final solution” for Palestinians in Gaza. In it, they advocated for the implementation of a total siege, cutting off water, food, and electricity while continuing relentless bombing. They argued this would send a clear message to Palestinians that the world, especially the U.S., stands with Israel, and no help was on the way. Therefore, if they wanted to survive, they would have to flee to the border with Egypt.
However, transnational Jewish Jihadists in the Biden administration opposed this plan, not on moral grounds, but because it would attract too much media and global attention, which liberal Jewish Jihadists always strive to avoid at all costs. Instead, they offered an alternative plan with a similar end result.
The U.S. exerted tremendous pressure on Egypt and Jordan to allow for the “voluntary displacement” of Palestinians from Gaza—a sanitized term for ethnic cleansing. Thankfully, Egypt and Jordan said no. They insisted that if the U.S. and Israel wanted to remove Palestinians from their historical land, they would have to find other means to do so alone, as they would not participate in the annihilation of their fellow Arabs.
As the 2024 election approached, Blinken and Jake Sullivan were running out of ideas and time without fully achieving their Jewish Jihad ethnic cleansing plan for Gaza. So, they handed it over to the incoming administration’s transnational Jewish Jihadists—Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, and especially Ivanka Trump. Jared Kushner has already made his intentions clear with his vision of Gaza as a place with a “very valuable” potentiality where a lot of “waterfront property” can be built owned by Jews. He has been leveraging his wife’s influence over her father to ensure Trump implements his plan, despite the MAGA base’s reluctance regarding Gaza. Mega MAGA influencers like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and, notably, Michael Flynn are pushing Trump in the opposite direction. However, their influence on Trump does not match that of Ivanka Trump over her father. This gives the Jewish Jihadists a significant advantage over the anti-Israel MAGA influencers. They plan to use Ivanka alone as a counterweight to the anti-Israel forces within MAGA, which pose the greatest threat to the long-standing bipartisan support for Israel.
Ivanka is already highly regarded by Jewish Jihadists in Israel, given the crucial role she played in her father moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and recognizing the Golan Heights as Israeli territory during his first term. In fact, she was the poster girl for the ceremony announcing the embassy move. As she delivered her remarks at the ceremony, hundreds of Palestinians protesting the move were shot and killed by Israeli forces. Ivanka remained unmoved, staying ecstatic throughout the event.
Note: it wasn’t always this way for Ivanka. There was a time when she was rejected by the Jewish community. Initially, the Rabbinical courts in Israel rejected her conversion application and refused to recognize her as Jewish, even though she had already converted and married Jared Kushner—from an influential Chabad family. However, everything changed when her father was elected president. Her conversion was automatically recognized, and the Jewish community as a whole rallied behind her, calling her their new Esther.
And then there’s the Netanyahu factor
Netanyahu, one of the world’s most manipulative and psychopathic criminals, has over the years demonstrated his ability to push around U.S. leaders like toddlers in a stroller, even those who campaigned to be tough on him or his country. Some attribute this disproportionate influence over every U.S. president, both Republican and Democrat, to the Israel lobby AIPAC essentially owning Congress. Others argue it’s the Deep State—comprising intelligence agencies, academia, and media—all functioning as an extension of the Jewish State, giving Netanyahu almost supernatural leverage over U.S. presidents. A third perspective suggests it’s all due to blackmail, with Netanyahu, through Mossad, Epstein, Hollywood, and Pegasus, having collected enough compromising material on the daughters and wives of U.S. politicians, power brokers, influencers, and podcasters, making them essentially his puppets.
I believe it’s a combination of all these factors. The Lobby, the Deep State, and the blackmail ring all work together collaboratively and cooperatively. If one lacks the leverage needed for particular circumstances, another quickly steps in to supply the ammunition. This ensures Netanyahu always has a backup plan.
Netanyahu is in DC today, Monday, February 4, 2025, for a meeting with Trump, where the interplay of these elements is on display for all to see. As Israeli media reported, the lobby has done its job ahead of the meeting between the two men, taking Netanyahu to the Capitol to meet Congress, showing Trump that while he may control the executive office, Netanyahu has the legislative branch in his pocket.
The media has also played its part to some extent. Just in time for the meeting, The New York Times published a potentially misleading story about Iran racing to create a bomb, aiming to shift the discussion from Gaza to Iran. If all this fails to influence Trump’s thinking on one or two issues, especially regarding the future of Hamas ruling Gaza, Netanyahu has a surprise for Trump: atrocity propaganda.
With the help of Jewish Jihadists in Trump’s inner circle, Netanyahu has arranged for Trump to watch an atrocity propaganda movie about the events of October 7 before their meeting tomorrow. This high-level, state-sponsored, manipulative psychological operation will likely change Trump’s mind about the Gaza ceasefire and might even push him to urge Netanyahu to restart the war.
Note: this is not the first time Netanyahu has used heinous propaganda against the Palestinian people to convince Trump they are monsters undeserving of a peace settlement with Israel. In 2018, during his first meeting with Trump, Netanyahu used an AI-generated (at the time, a novelty) fake video showing Abbas saying nasty things about Jews. This infuriated Trump to the point where he cut off all contact with Palestinian leadership.
Netanyahu will return to Israel a happy man. He might not succeed in changing Trump’s mind about Iran—getting him to publicly advocate for military action against Iran’s nuclear program—or resuming the genocide before the second phase of the ceasefire agreement is implemented, in which all captives are to be released and Israel fully withdraws from Gaza. However, he would feel content knowing he has given Trump plenty of reasons to believe his ethnic cleansing plan for Gaza is the only solution.
