In 1799, Napoleon Bonaparte, reeling from his failed siege of Acre, proclaimed Jews the “rightful heirs of Palestine” to fracture Ottoman resistance, while his troops massacred thousands in Jaffa. In September 2025, French President Emmanuel Macron proposed a UN-mandated “stabilization force” for Gaza, framed as support for a Palestinian state France now claims to recognize. This essay unmasks Macron as an agent of a Jewish Jihad—a religio-political project driven by powerful Jewish financial and political elites, mirroring the roles played by King Louis IX, swayed by Christian millennialists and intellectuals like Leibniz, and Napoleon, bankrolled by the Rothschilds and shaped by proto-Zionist Thomas Corbet. Macron’s proposal is not about Palestinian statehood but about perpetuating Israel’s siege on Gaza, continuing a 200-year French tradition of manipulating the Levant to reconstitute a biblical Israel. As Napoleon declared, “If I governed a nation of Jews, I should reestablish the Temple of Solomon,” a vision Macron’s plan revives, ensuring Palestinians pay a devastating price for centuries, as they still suffer from France’s millennialist-driven schemes.
Macron’s Proposal: A Jewish Jihad Masquerading as Peacekeeping
Macron’s 2025 Gaza initiative, backed by 142 nations and coordinated with Saudi Arabia, proposes a UN-mandated multinational force to secure Gaza, disarm Hamas, oversee elections, and manage reconstruction. France’s recognition of Palestine at the UN General Assembly, alongside 146 nations, casts Macron as a champion of Palestinian rights. Yet, the plan’s focus on demilitarizing Hamas, coordinating with Israeli operations, and omitting clear Israeli withdrawal timelines betrays its true intent: to entrench Israel’s control under a facade of international legitimacy. Far from fostering statehood, this initiative ensures Gaza remains a demilitarized enclave, its reconstruction funds channeled through Western and Israeli-aligned networks.
Macron serves as a front for Jewish political and financial elites orchestrating a Jewish Jihad—a religio-nationalist drive to secure the Greater Israel Project in the Levant.
His “unprecedented international commitment” is a veneer for a neocolonial scheme that aligns with Zionist interests, echoing the Rothschilds’ financial machinations and prioritizing Israeli security over Palestinian sovereignty. This is not peacekeeping but a calculated move to sustain Gaza’s siege, orchestrated by the same elite networks that have long shaped France’s Levantine ambitions.
Historical Precedents: France’s Leaders as Puppets of Millennialist and Zionist Agendas, King Louis IX and Christian Millennialist Influence:
In 1248–1254, Louis IX’s Seventh Crusade targeted Egypt to seize Palestine, driven by Christian millennialist fervor that envisioned a restored holy land as a prelude to Christ’s return. Influenced by intellectuals like Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, whose later writings framed the Levant as a stage for divine redemption, Louis saw his campaign as a sacred mission to reclaim Jerusalem for God’s chosen. His defeat at Mansurah and ransom—one-third of France’s GDP—strengthened Mamluk rule, leaving Palestine fragmented and vulnerable to future foreign incursions. This millennialist mindset, viewing Muslims as obstacles to a divine order, set a precedent for France’s religio-political interventions, with Palestinians bearing the long-term consequences.
Napoleon, Rothschild, and Corbet’s Proto-Zionist Vision:
Napoleon’s 1798–1801 Egyptian-Syrian campaign, financed by the Rothschild banking dynasty, secularized this millennialist zeal but retained its biblical core. Guided by Thomas Corbet, a proto-Zionist whose writings advocated Jewish restoration in Palestine, Napoleon issued his 1799 proclamation and declared, “If I governed a nation of Jews, I should reestablish the Temple of Solomon.” His massacres at Jaffa (4,100 prisoners executed) and failed Acre siege aimed to destabilize the Ottoman Levant, creating space for a French-controlled biblical Israel. The Rothschilds, emerging as key financiers, saw the campaign as a strategic investment to secure Jewish influence, aligning with Corbet’s vision of a reconstituted Temple. Now we have Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff and Haward Lutnick pushing for the same agenda under the guise of “Gaza Rivera.”
Though defeated, Napoleon’s actions weakened Ottoman control, paving the way for British mandates and Zionist settlement.
Both Louis and Napoleon were tools of religio-political lobbies—Christian millennialists for the former, Jewish financial elites and proto-Zionist ideologues for the latter—using France’s power to advance a biblical restoration that subjugated Palestinians, leaving a legacy of division and dispossession.
The Millennialist Mindset: A Religio-Colonial Continuum
The millennialist mindset underpins France’s Levantine interventions, evolving from Louis’s crusader zeal to Napoleon’s Rothschild-backed imperialism and Macron’s modern scheme. This mindset, rooted in Christian eschatology and later co-opted by Zionist ambitions, views the Levant as a stage for divine fulfillment, with local populations as mere obstacles. In the 19th century, France’s colonial ventures in the Pacific echoed this, imposing hierarchies that justified subjugation as “civilizing” missions. Napoleon’s campaign, fueled by Rothschild wealth and Corbet’s ideology, was a proto-Zionist project to impose French oversight while promising Jewish restoration, akin to colonial pacts that offered nominal autonomy but delivered control.
Macron’s stabilization force is this mindset’s latest manifestation. By recognizing Palestine while enforcing demilitarization and international oversight, Macron acts as a proxy for Jewish elites, ensuring Gaza remains a controlled enclave. This Jewish Jihad—a religio-nationalist drive to secure Israel’s dominance—positions France as a conduit for Zionist interests, echoing Napoleon’s Temple fantasy and Louis’s millennialist crusades. The UN mandate is a modern equivalent of colonial garrisons, subordinating Palestinians while funneling reconstruction profits to Western and Israeli-aligned elites.
The Enduring Cost: Palestinians as Victims of France’s Millennialist Schemes
France’s interventions have inflicted a crushing toll on Palestinians for over two centuries. Louis’s crusade fragmented the Levant, weakening regional powers and setting the stage for foreign domination. Napoleon’s Rothschild-backed campaign destabilized Ottoman rule, enabling the British Mandate and the 1917 Balfour Declaration—addressed to the Rothschilds—which catalyzed Zionist settlement and the 1948 Nakba. Macron’s stabilization force threatens to perpetuate this legacy, locking Gaza into a demilitarized, aid-dependent enclave. Reconstruction funds, controlled by international (French-led) channels, risk becoming a financial boon for Jewish and Western elites, mirroring Rothschild profiteering from Napoleon’s wars. Palestinians face another 200 years of subjugation, their “state” reduced to a managed reserve under the guise of stabilization.
Palestinian rejecting this is the only path forward. By rejecting Macron’s neocolonial Trojan horse, Palestinians can demand true multilateralism that dismantles Israel’s siege, not sustains it. The alternative is a Gaza forever chained to the millennialist fantasies of France’s puppet leaders.
Conclusion
Emmanuel Macron, like Louis IX and Napoleon before him, is an agent of a Jewish Jihad driven by powerful Jewish political and financial elites, from Leibniz’s millennialist allies to the Rothschilds and Corbet’s proto-Zionist vision. His 2025 Gaza stabilization force, cloaked in UN legitimacy, is no aid to Palestinian statehood but a mechanism to entrench Israel’s siege, reviving Napoleon’s dream to “reestablish the Temple of Solomon” and Louis’s crusader zeal. The millennialist mindset—France’s enduring religio-colonial lens—continues to cast Palestinians as obstacles to a biblical Israel, ensuring they pay a crushing price for centuries. Palestine must reject this latest French betrayal and seize its own destiny, lest it remain a pawn in a 200-year-old scheme driven by Zionist lobbies and their willing proxies.