Kamala’s Fall: The Establishment’s Plan to Reset America

 

 

Don’t be fooled by the faux tears and scripted reactions from the DNC establishment following Kamala Harris’s emphatic loss to Donald Trump — the establishment wanted Trump to win all along. And they wanted him to win for two reasons: first, the desire to maintain the new global order that emerged post-OC 7, and second, to bring Russia back into the Western fold.

 

Here’s what I mean. The event that took place on OC 7 in the Middle East — a specific, tiny area that, from a strategic standpoint, holds no real value for the West — had a seismic impact on the entire world. That event not only changed Middle Eastern society for the better for a select few and for the worse for the many, but it also altered America’s trajectory in radical, unexpected ways. This shift in turn transformed U.S. foreign policy, which rippled outward to reshape the global order that existed pre-OC 7.

 

The aftermath not only led to the annihilation of over 200,000 Palestinian civilians, according to The Lancet Medical Journal, but also marked the death of DEI, human rights-focused politics, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and the protection of minorities.

 

The progressive social activism that took root in the American psyche over the last decade — driven by diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, LGBTQ+ rights, and the promotion of intersectionality — effectively died on OC 7. It all collapsed when American students, who had been the lifeblood of these progressive movements, either supported Hamas or blamed Israel as the party responsible for the attack.

 

This flabbergasted the establishment, which had previously encouraged these groups to achieve its own ends. Now, the donors and party elites were forced to step out from behind the scenes. Billionaires like Bill Ackman and Robert Kraft used their cash and influence to wrest control of the party away from the grassroots. However, this wasn’t the first time the elite billionaires presented themselves as the solution to a thorny problem.

 

A similar phenomenon occurred in the 1970s. In 1975, New York City declared bankruptcy, unable to pay its bills or salaries for police and sanitation workers. So, bankers and billionaires stepped in and took over. They essentially sidelined the mayor, saying they were taking control of the city’s finances. Through austerity, asset sales, and privatization, they restored solvency but transformed it from a city for ordinary people into a playground for the wealthy elite.

 

The same thing happened to the Democratic Party after OC 7. Billionaires like Ackman swapped their corporate activities for Israel cheerleading, using their influence to reshape campus discourse. They elevated the situation to a crisis of international proportions, leveraging their media reach to shift public opinion, even changing the tone of Congress and altering public discussions on the issue.

 

They hauled faculty heads from Ivy League colleges, interrogated them as though they were terrorists, and removed them from their posts. The election was the final step in clearing house after taking over universities and colleges.

 

Following the OC 7 attacks, I noticed a shift in messaging among the so-called conservative movement, particularly their “thinkers” like Ben Shapiro. In an interview a week after the attack, Shapiro told a Rabbi  that the solution to the anti-Israel reaction among American students was to revive American nationalism — to restore the U.S. to its post-WW2 status as a more nationalistic, muscular Judeo-Christian nation. According to Shapiro, this was the only way to counter the scenes he found appalling on American campuses and progressive social media.

 

The same conclusion was echoed by the Weinstein brothers, as if they all attended the same “reverse America” workshop. The Weinsteins went even further, dismissing the liberal world order entirely, calling for a return to pre-WW2 values — a world divided by color, class, gender, and religion. They proposed reviving eugenics and prioritizing the elite over the “peasants,” dismissing LGBTQ+ issues, DEI, and intersectionality altogether.

 

 

 

 

The “Queen of DEI”

Grok generated illustration

 

 

 

Their first step toward achieving a “woke-free” world was to uproot DEI from its final bastions: federal and local governments. Corporate America, mass media, and academia had already dismantled DEI programs. The key to achieving this? Removing their “queen,” Kamala Harris, who they saw as the ultimate embodiment of DEI. Many people, whether they admit it or not, agree with them because, honestly, that’s how she got the job.

 

However, it wasn’t in the way you might think. Kamala didn’t get the job simply because she was Black; she was chosen because her views aligned with the deep state’s agenda. DEI-based hires in powerful positions are reserved for those who pass the establishment’s litmus test. Kamala fit this profile: a Black woman married to a white man, like Ilhan Omar, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and Don Lemon.

 

Kamala Harris was only picked after George Floyd’s murder ignited protests and forced the Democratic Party’s hand. Before that incident, the Democratic primary had already concluded, with Biden as the presumptive nominee. The VP shortlist was down to two women — both white: Senators Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren. The murder of George Floyd upended that process, pressuring the Democratic leadership to make a symbolic gesture by choosing a Black woman.

 

However, the establishment didn’t choose Stacey Abrams, despite the support she had from the Black community. Her stance on issues, particularly regarding Israel, made her unsuitable in the eyes of the party’s handlers. Biden’s team — Blinken, Sullivan, and former Chief of Staff Ron Klain — found Kamala to be the perfect fit–: someone  eagerly willing to go  with their programming  with the least resistance.

 

But after the OC 7 event, they couldn’t wait to remove her. They wanted to take America back to its post-WW2 days: a more Judeo-Christian, militaristic, and unapologetically nationalistic nation. They sought to dismantle social stratification by race, gender, and ideology. No more Black leaders, no more LGBTQ+, no more progressivism. For that reversal to happen, Kamala Harris had to go.

 

 

 

 

Thwarting “the Rising Tide of Color”

Grok generated illustration

 

 

 

The next step is starting a war with China. Trump’s assignment over the next four years is to bring Russia back into the Western sphere of influence, away from China and Iran. Why? Because Russia plays a crucial role in the quest for the “restoration” of Greater Israel. Russia is not only the birthplace of modern Zionism, but it’s also a key component in maintaining Western hegemony — which, as we learned post-OC 7, is effectively Israeli hegemony. (I’ll expand on this in one of my upcoming essays. Stay tuned.)

 

Trump’s primary objective is to shift the focus away from Russia, as it has already fulfilled its part, and direct it toward China. This strategy is already evident in his cabinet picks — filled with Russophiles and anti-China crusaders.

 

The entire purpose of the Ukraine-Russia war — aside from enriching the military-industrial complex that has significantly boosted America’s GDP — was to draw China into the conflict. The goal was for the U.S. and its allies to impose crippling sanctions on China, similar to what was done to Japan during WWII, before delivering a final blow to weaken and potentially dismantle China’s power. However, with its painful memories of WWII and its long history of Western interference, China was wise enough to avoid taking the bait. Xi Jinping rejected Putin’s overtures to share military technology, knowing that any shared secrets would likely be leaked to the West.

 

Now, Trump’s task is to pull Russia back from the brink of becoming a permanent enemy of the West. The plan is to mend fences with Putin by acknowledging Russia’s role in the recent geopolitical game. Trump is expected to tell Putin, “Well done. You’ve played your part. Sanctions will be lifted, and the war with Ukraine will come to a stalemate. Both sides will return to their pre-war positions — a win for both Russia and the West.”

 

Once this détente with Russia is achieved, the focus will shift toward isolating and confronting China. Trump, along with his newly aligned Russia, will begin planning strategies to destabilize China, with Taiwan being the catalyst. This will involve false flag attacks and other sabotage efforts to provoke conflict, ultimately aiming for China’s downfall.

abdi

Writer & Blogger