If you’ve been following mainstream media lately, you might be led to believe that the Jewish community in America is a small, besieged minority, powerless against a coalition of other communities that control everything from banking to government, finance, media, entertainment, and even elections. This narrative might prompt sympathy, making one think, “I feel bad for them, what can we do to help?” However, this portrayal is far from reality.
In reality, while every other demographic in America—whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists—is grappling with the choice between a thrice-divorced, convicted felon and a childless cat lady who struggles to speak coherently without a script, Jewish Americans are faced with a different dilemma: choosing between two candidates who both promise significant support–between a father-in-law or a daughter-in-law.
For Jewish voters, Donald Trump, often criticized as racist and a threat to democracy, human rights, and international alliances like NATO, is seen as a modern-day King Cyrus—the biblical Persian king who favored the Jews. Trump is viewed as someone who has already done much for them and promises even more, including potentially aggressive actions towards Iran.
On the other hand, Kamala Harris is perceived by some as an inauthentic, radical leftist who’s out of touch with most Americans, or as just another establishment figure akin to Cheney or Netanyahu, not worthy of their vote due to her support for the Gaza genocide. Yet, for many in the Jewish community, she symbolizes a protector, akin to Zipporah, Moses’s wife in the Bible.
This is where the Jewish dilemma in this election arises. Caught between a father-in-law and a sister-in-law candidates both promising them the world and genocide. Current polls might suggest a preference for Democrats, but polls regarding Jewish voters are notoriously unreliable. Jewish voters historically lean liberal on social issues but hawkish on foreign policy, often leading them to misrepresent their voting intentions to pollsters.
So, how can we really tell which way they are going to vote this time? There are two primary methods:
- The Establishment’s Choice: Look at who is being pushed by the establishment, particularly the deep state—corporate entities, intelligence community, and mainstream media.
- Netanyahu’s Selection: Determine who Benjamin Netanyahu, the real “Apprentice” master, has chosen for this election.
The answer to the first method is straightforward: Kamala Harris is the favored candidate, and it’s not even close. Numerous former Trump administration members, intelligence officers, and spies have publicly endorsed Kamala.
As for the second method—Netanyahu’s choice—it’s more intricate and will require significant analysis to reach a definitive conclusion.
The Apprentice.
The real “Apprentice” isn’t Donald Trump; it’s Benjamin Netanyahu. He’s been running the longest political Apprentice show in history. The key difference between Trump’s TV show and Netanyahu’s political game is the stakes: Netanyahu’s Apprentice deals with real-world outcomes, not just ratings.
Since 1996, when he first encountered his initial “Apprentice,” Bill Clinton, through to 2024, Netanyahu has been Israel’s Prime Minister, with only brief interruptions coinciding with midterms—never during presidential elections. Every four years, Netanyahu visits DC to evaluate the candidates, selecting the one who will most compliantly advance Israel’s interests in their presidential agenda.
This year, Netanyahu conducted his Apprentice assessments in August, meeting both Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House and Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago.
But first, let’s go back eight years, right before the 2016 election. Netanyahu came to Washington DC for his quarterly show where both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump auditioned for him. For Hillary Clinton, the audition was merely a formality because Netanyahu knew her husband—Bill Clinton—who had done more for Israel than any other president—and herself quite well. She was a tested politician, especially concerning Israel; she was reliable, and he wasn’t worried about her at all. His lobbyists and Hasbara assured him she would do everything for him and for Israel. However, to extract even more from her, Netanyahu told her, “Hey, there is another Apprentice, more talented than you in town, who is new to the political arena and has ignited a rare passion in the electorate and is willing to do more for me.”
Trump, on the other hand, was a wild wildcard. A wild orange card—orange is considered bad luck in Jewish culture—so a significant portion of his 2016 Apprentice was dedicated to guiding and controlling Trump. To establish dominance early, Netanyahu had Trump audition publicly before a private closed-door session. The initial audition with Trump was held openly at the sidelines of the UN in New York. Trump impressed Netanyahu so much that he immediately summoned one of his trusted lobbyists and fixers, requesting a private room where Trump could comfortably offer even more.
To Netanyahu’s astonishment, Trump’s proposal exceeded expectations. Trump was like, “Your wish, my command, boss.” He expressed a desire to revolutionize Middle Eastern policy, overturning the previous 20 years of the U.S. government’s approach.
“I don’t care about what the Arabs, Palestinians want; the status of Al Quds—Jerusalem—I will fulfill all your wildest dreams.” Convinced, Netanyahu secretly endorsed Trump, instructing his special political operatives in DC, lobbyists, and Jewish Zionist donors to do everything in their power to guarantee Trump’s victory. They executed their tasks as ordered, working alongside what some might call Jewish transnational Jihadists, —consider the Russia collusion—and indeed, they secured Trump’s win. As the 2016 Apprentice victor, Trump delivered for Netanyahu: he “gave” the Golan Heights—occupied Syrian territory—to Israel, moved the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, shut down the Palestinian-only diplomatic office in DC, and signed numerous executive orders to support Israel’s occupation. He also bribed Arab and Muslim countries to normalize relations with Israel—leading to the Abraham Accords.
Eight years later, in August 2024, Netanyahu returned to DC for another thrilling Apprentice showdown. This year, his Apprentice sessions took place in the White House with Vice President Kamala Harris and in Mar-a-Lago with Donald Trump. Netanyahu didn’t require additional auditions from either candidate, proceeding directly to his demands. Regarding Kamala Harris, she’s seen as a tested politician with qualities akin to a pet—like Hillary Clinton. Her proven track record of pleasing Netanyahu and prioritizing Israel—evident in her actions and statements following OC 7—means Netanyahu has complete trust in her. He knows he can control her directly through her AIPAC Guy ( the second gentleman). Moreover, those who’ve always controlled her and uphold the system and status quo are poised to ensure she acts predictably. After all, Kamala, as a product of the system and establishment, understands her Israel-related obligations, regardless of her public rhetoric aimed at her base.
However, with Trump, things are not so straightforward. Trump raised the bar significantly during his first term, surpassing Netanyahu’s expectations by several election cycles. So, what does Trump bring to the table for Netanyahu this time? Not much, except perhaps to nudge the GOP—which surprisingly has become the party with the most anti-Israel base—towards being more pro-Israel.
In fact, Netanyahu views a Trump victory in November as a potential liability. It’s less about what Trump might not do for Netanyahu and more about how he does it. His communication style to the world and the American public often leaves a negative impression. Trump openly states that Israel controls everything, including himself, and somehow makes it seem appealing—a narrative that Jewish Jihadist operatives strive to avoid at all costs. The distinction between actions taken discreetly for Israel and Trump’s public declarations is vast, straddling the line between perceived victimhood and outright antisemitic rhetoric.
Given the stark contrast between the two choices, all signs indicate that host Netanyahu has selected Kamala over Trump as his Apprentice, yet he maintains the appearance of supporting Trump. This isn’t coincidental; it’s the Mossad way, encapsulated by their motto, “By way of deception, thou shalt do war.” Trump’s unpredictability poses a risk to the long-term strategic interests of the Jewish State. On the other hand, Kamala, as a manufactured figurehead of the establishment, will uphold the status quo and serve as a reliable political tool. She won’t challenge the establishment; her policy influencers are his people—lobbyists and Democratic party elders.
Kamala perfectly aligns with Israel’s strategic objectives for the past year, characterized by genocide and destruction, as well as for the next four years. Israel has overreached in recent actions, causing a shift in global sentiment against it. It has bitten more than it could chew and swallowed more than it could digest. Her metaphorical tiny belly is full of the red meat of Palestinian and Lebanese babies. Its brutal genocidal actions caused the largest civilian deaths more than any nation since Nazi Germany during WWII. To metabolize these events and attempt to restore some semblance of international reputation, Israel needs time—time away from the headlines, away from further military engagements. This requires at least four years of respite, which could only come from a presidency like Kamala Harris’s. Like a lion needing time to digest after a feast of baby buffalo, Israel requires this period to process its actions. Therefore, Netanyahu, along with his lobbyists like AIPAC, ZOA, ADL, and other organizations, will exert all efforts to ensure Kamala’s presidency. This resolves the Jewish Dilemma for this election: the choice is Kamala, not Trump, the sister-in-law over the father-in-law.
